Gotta v. Urso
Gotta v. Urso is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/02/2005 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/17/2007.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sidney A Fitzwater · 5,270 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:05-cv-01144
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/02/2005
- Date terminated
- 08/17/2007
6,547 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gotta v. Urso?
Gotta v. Urso is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/02/2005 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/17/2007. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:05-cv-01144.
When was the case filed?
Gotta v. Urso was filed on 06/02/2005. It was terminated on 08/17/2007.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12253653 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:05-cv-01144 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).