Grasty v. Pto
Grasty v. Pto is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/10/2006 in the District Court, E.D. Virginia. The case was terminated on 01/31/2006.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Virginia (E.D. Va.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Gerald Bruce Lee · 2,554 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:06-cv-00040
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 01/10/2006
- Date terminated
- 01/31/2006
1,776 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Grasty v. Pto?
Grasty v. Pto is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/10/2006 in the District Court, E.D. Virginia. The case was terminated on 01/31/2006. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Virginia, docket number 1:06-cv-00040.
When was the case filed?
Grasty v. Pto was filed on 01/10/2006. It was terminated on 01/31/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14140386 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:06-cv-00040 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).