Gray & Company Inc v. Archer Daniels Midland Co

Court

District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Owen M. Panner · 1,520 cases in index

Docket number

3:97-cv-00069

Nature of suit

410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal question

Date filed

01/14/1997

Date terminated

11/08/2004

117 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Gray & Company Inc · 5 cases
• defendant · Archer Daniels Midland Company Food Processing & Manufacturing · 139 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 140 Antitrust cases in our index naming Archer Daniels Midland Company — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• United Wisconsin Grain Producers LLC v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
  District Court, C.D. IllinoisFiled 11/11/2020
• Midwest Renewable Energy LLC v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
  District Court, C.D. IllinoisFiled 07/23/2020
• Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
  District Court, D. MinnesotaFiled 03/25/2008
• Synergy Foods, L. L. C v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
  District Court, E.D. MichiganFiled 09/23/2004
• Lief, Madelon J v. Archer Daniels Midland Co
  District Court, W.D. WisconsinFiled 03/12/2003

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Gray & Company Inc v. Archer Daniels Midland Co?

Gray & Company Inc v. Archer Daniels Midland Co is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 01/14/1997 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 11/08/2004. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:97-cv-00069.

When was the case filed?

Gray & Company Inc v. Archer Daniels Midland Co was filed on 01/14/1997. It was terminated on 11/08/2004.