Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Antitrust Lawsuit

Gray & Company v. Adm

Antitrust Terminated 05/13/2003 District Court, C.D. Illinois

Gray & Company v. Adm is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 06/02/1997 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 05/13/2003.

Court
District Court, C.D. Illinois (C.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Michael M. Mihm · 2,633 cases in index
Docket number
1:97-cv-01203
Nature of suit
410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
06/02/1997
Date terminated
05/13/2003

108 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Gray & Company v. Adm?

Gray & Company v. Adm is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 06/02/1997 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 05/13/2003. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, C.D. Illinois, docket number 1:97-cv-01203.

When was the case filed?

Gray & Company v. Adm was filed on 06/02/1997. It was terminated on 05/13/2003.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Antitrust Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 11628547).