Green v. Masimo Corp

Court

District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Kenneth L. Ryskamp · 4,802 cases in index

Docket number

9:09-cv-82355

Cause

42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
42 U.S.C. § 2000

Nature of suit

790 Labor: Other
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

11/30/2009

Date terminated

03/29/2010

32,135 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Green · 6897 cases
• defendant · Masimo Corporation Medical Devices & Equipment · 23 cases
• defendant · Masimo Corp

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 24 Labor cases in our index naming MASIMO CORPORATION — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Green v. Masimo Corp?

Green v. Masimo Corp is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 11/30/2009 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 03/29/2010. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 9:09-cv-82355.

When was the case filed?

Green v. Masimo Corp was filed on 11/30/2009. It was terminated on 03/29/2010.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 42 U.S.C. § 2000.