Grilli v. Meyer Bros Etal
Grilli v. Meyer Bros Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/14/1987 in the District Court, D. Puerto Rico. The case was terminated on 03/22/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Puerto Rico (D.P.R.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 05/14/1987
- Date terminated
- 03/22/1989
472 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Grilli · 9 cases
- defendant · Meyer Bros Etal
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Grilli v. Meyer Bros Etal?
Grilli v. Meyer Bros Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/14/1987 in the District Court, D. Puerto Rico. The case was terminated on 03/22/1989. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
When was the case filed?
Grilli v. Meyer Bros Etal was filed on 05/14/1987. It was terminated on 03/22/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8745496 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).