Gro Master Feed Inc v. Naser
Gro Master Feed Inc v. Naser is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/25/1987 in the District Court, N.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/30/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Iowa (N.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/25/1987
- Date terminated
- 03/30/1988
109 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Gro Master Feed Inc · 11 cases
- defendant · Naser · 21 cases
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gro Master Feed Inc v. Naser?
Gro Master Feed Inc v. Naser is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/25/1987 in the District Court, N.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/30/1988. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Iowa.
When was the case filed?
Gro Master Feed Inc v. Naser was filed on 09/25/1987. It was terminated on 03/30/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8657011 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).