Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Labor Lawsuit

Hager v. High Tech Electric

Labor Terminated 02/10/2006 District Court, D. North Dakota

Hager v. High Tech Electric is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/01/2005 in the District Court, D. North Dakota. The case was terminated on 02/10/2006.

Court
District Court, D. North Dakota (D.N.D.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Ralph R. Erickson · 773 cases in index
Docket number
3:05-cv-00012
Nature of suit
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
02/01/2005
Date terminated
02/10/2006

379 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hager v. High Tech Electric?

Hager v. High Tech Electric is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/01/2005 in the District Court, D. North Dakota. The case was terminated on 02/10/2006. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. North Dakota, docket number 3:05-cv-00012.

When was the case filed?

Hager v. High Tech Electric was filed on 02/01/2005. It was terminated on 02/10/2006.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Labor Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 19941102).