Hager v. Zaidman
Hager v. Zaidman is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/17/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 08/24/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Connecticut (D. Conn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Warren W. Eginton · 2,858 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:91-cv-00382
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/17/1991
- Date terminated
- 08/24/1992
1,008 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hager v. Zaidman?
Hager v. Zaidman is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/17/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 08/24/1992. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Connecticut, docket number 5:91-cv-00382.
When was the case filed?
Hager v. Zaidman was filed on 07/17/1991. It was terminated on 08/24/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9119762 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:91-cv-00382 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).