Haggerty v. Buttner
Haggerty v. Buttner is a federal contract lawsuit in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 04/29/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California (C.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 8:91-mc-00664
- Nature of suit
- 190 Other contract actions
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- —
- Date terminated
- 04/29/1991
52,728 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Haggerty v. Buttner?
Haggerty v. Buttner is a federal contract lawsuit in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 04/29/1991. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. California, docket number 8:91-mc-00664.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9245397 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:91-mc-00664 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).