Hahn v. Ryan
Hahn v. Ryan is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/27/2001 in the District Court, D. Nebraska. The case was terminated on 02/15/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Nebraska (D. Neb.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Warren K. Urbom · 737 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:01-cv-03093
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/27/2001
- Date terminated
- 02/15/2002
410 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hahn v. Ryan?
Hahn v. Ryan is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/27/2001 in the District Court, D. Nebraska. The case was terminated on 02/15/2002. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Nebraska, docket number 4:01-cv-03093.
When was the case filed?
Hahn v. Ryan was filed on 04/27/2001. It was terminated on 02/15/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 19044480 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:01-cv-03093 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).