Hahn v. US
Hahn v. US is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/21/1988 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 03/31/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Douglas P. Woodlock · 8,381 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:88-cv-02562
- Nature of suit
- 871 IRS 3rd party suits 26 USC 7609
Third-party tax claims under 26 U.S.C. § 7609. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 11/21/1988
- Date terminated
- 03/31/1989
8,000 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hahn v. US?
Hahn v. US is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/21/1988 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 03/31/1989. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:88-cv-02562.
When was the case filed?
Hahn v. US was filed on 11/21/1988. It was terminated on 03/31/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8743283 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:88-cv-02562 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).