Haji v. Armstrong
Haji v. Armstrong is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 04/20/2004 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 04/22/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John D. Holschuh · 1,976 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:04-cv-00305
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 04/20/2004
- Date terminated
- 04/22/2005
4,598 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Haji v. Armstrong?
Haji v. Armstrong is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 04/20/2004 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 04/22/2005. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 2:04-cv-00305.
When was the case filed?
Haji v. Armstrong was filed on 04/20/2004. It was terminated on 04/22/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11992623 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:04-cv-00305 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).