Halloran v. Rose
Halloran v. Rose is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 04/27/2005 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 11/30/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Joseph L. Tauro · 3,743 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:05-cv-10847
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/27/2005
- Date terminated
- 11/30/2005
2,291 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Halloran v. Rose?
Halloran v. Rose is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 04/27/2005 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 11/30/2005. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:05-cv-10847.
When was the case filed?
Halloran v. Rose was filed on 04/27/2005. It was terminated on 11/30/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4282072 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:05-cv-10847 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).