Hamm v. Hamilton
Hamm v. Hamilton is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/22/1995 in the District Court, S.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/01/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Texas (S.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sim Lake · 5,508 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:95-cv-05340
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 11/22/1995
- Date terminated
- 08/01/1996
2,881 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hamm v. Hamilton?
Hamm v. Hamilton is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/22/1995 in the District Court, S.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/01/1996. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Texas, docket number 4:95-cv-05340.
When was the case filed?
Hamm v. Hamilton was filed on 11/22/1995. It was terminated on 08/01/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10171416 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:95-cv-05340 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).