Hanlon v. Barton
Hanlon v. Barton is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 07/21/1988 in the District Court, D. Alaska. The case was terminated on 10/23/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Alaska (D. Alaska)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James A. Von Der Heydt · 89 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:88-cv-00025
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 07/21/1988
- Date terminated
- 10/23/1991
1,599 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hanlon v. Barton?
Hanlon v. Barton is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 07/21/1988 in the District Court, D. Alaska. The case was terminated on 10/23/1991. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Alaska, docket number 1:88-cv-00025.
When was the case filed?
Hanlon v. Barton was filed on 07/21/1988. It was terminated on 10/23/1991.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8668296 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:88-cv-00025 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).