Harden v. Primus
Harden v. Primus is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/15/2006 in the District Court, M.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 06/20/2006.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Georgia (M.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Clay D Land · 2,317 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:06-cv-00063
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 06/15/2006
- Date terminated
- 06/20/2006
922 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Harden v. Primus?
Harden v. Primus is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/15/2006 in the District Court, M.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 06/20/2006. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Georgia, docket number 4:06-cv-00063.
When was the case filed?
Harden v. Primus was filed on 06/15/2006. It was terminated on 06/20/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14254114 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:06-cv-00063 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).