Harris v. Boyd
Harris v. Boyd is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/09/2018 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 12/06/2018.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Susan Richard Nelson · 2,009 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:18-cv-02890
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/09/2018
- Date terminated
- 12/06/2018
2,109 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Harris v. Boyd?
Harris v. Boyd is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/09/2018 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 12/06/2018. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:18-cv-02890.
When was the case filed?
Harris v. Boyd was filed on 10/09/2018. It was terminated on 12/06/2018.
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8356867 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:18-cv-02890 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).