Harty v. Ren
Harty v. Ren is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/22/2001 in the District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 09/09/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Oklahoma (W.D. Okla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Stephen P. Friot · 1,967 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:01-cv-00187
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/22/2001
- Date terminated
- 09/09/2002
174 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Harty v. Ren?
Harty v. Ren is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/22/2001 in the District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 09/09/2002. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Oklahoma, docket number 5:01-cv-00187.
When was the case filed?
Harty v. Ren was filed on 01/22/2001. It was terminated on 09/09/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11494061 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:01-cv-00187 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).