Hassell v. Babbitt
Hassell v. Babbitt is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/21/1995 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/25/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Stephen M McNamee · 2,443 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:95-cv-02893
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/21/1995
- Date terminated
- 07/25/1997
6,318 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hassell v. Babbitt?
Hassell v. Babbitt is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/21/1995 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/25/1997. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:95-cv-02893.
When was the case filed?
Hassell v. Babbitt was filed on 12/21/1995. It was terminated on 07/25/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10427732 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:95-cv-02893 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).