Hauck v. Lattimer
Hauck v. Lattimer is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/21/1991 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/28/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Shelby Highsmith · 2,395 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:91-cv-08065
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 02/21/1991
- Date terminated
- 05/28/1992
4,156 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hauck v. Lattimer?
Hauck v. Lattimer is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/21/1991 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/28/1992. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 9:91-cv-08065.
When was the case filed?
Hauck v. Lattimer was filed on 02/21/1991. It was terminated on 05/28/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9520586 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:91-cv-08065 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).