Heaton v. Joyner
Heaton v. Joyner is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/13/1994 in the District Court, S.D. California. The case was terminated on 12/01/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. California (S.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Edward J. Schwartz · 943 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:94-cv-01576
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/13/1994
- Date terminated
- 12/01/1994
1,291 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Heaton v. Joyner?
Heaton v. Joyner is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/13/1994 in the District Court, S.D. California. The case was terminated on 12/01/1994. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. California, docket number 3:94-cv-01576.
When was the case filed?
Heaton v. Joyner was filed on 10/13/1994. It was terminated on 12/01/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10045341 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:94-cv-01576 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).