Held v. Presto Lock
Held v. Presto Lock is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/29/1993 in the District Court, W.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/05/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Texas (W.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/29/1993
- Date terminated
- 05/05/1994
5,929 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Held · 118 cases
- defendant · Presto Lock
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Held v. Presto Lock?
Held v. Presto Lock is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/29/1993 in the District Court, W.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/05/1994. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Texas.
When was the case filed?
Held v. Presto Lock was filed on 09/29/1993. It was terminated on 05/05/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13610545 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).