Hellard v. Bowlen
Hellard v. Bowlen is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 04/09/1992 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 02/24/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Tennessee (E.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- R Leon Jordan · 1,931 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:92-cv-00226
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/09/1992
- Date terminated
- 02/24/1995
269 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hellard v. Bowlen?
Hellard v. Bowlen is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 04/09/1992 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 02/24/1995. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee, docket number 3:92-cv-00226.
When was the case filed?
Hellard v. Bowlen was filed on 04/09/1992. It was terminated on 02/24/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9413555 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:92-cv-00226 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).