Higgins v. Pool Corporation
Higgins v. Pool Corporation is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 02/07/2012 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 05/30/2012.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Louisiana (E.D. La.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sarah S. Vance · 3,978 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:12-cv-00378
- Cause
- 15:2 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization) - Nature of suit
- 410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 02/07/2012
- Date terminated
- 05/30/2012
208 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Higgins · 1022 cases
- defendant · Pool Corporation Wholesale Trade - Durable Goods · 84 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Pool Corporation is named in 84 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Antitrust cases naming the same defendant:
About Antitrust Lawsuits
Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Higgins v. Pool Corporation?
Higgins v. Pool Corporation is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 02/07/2012 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 05/30/2012. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana, docket number 2:12-cv-00378.
When was the case filed?
Higgins v. Pool Corporation was filed on 02/07/2012. It was terminated on 05/30/2012.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Antitrust Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12893502 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:12-cv-00378 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).