Hinkle v. Ssa
Hinkle v. Ssa is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/17/2002 in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 03/04/2003.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Kentucky (E.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David L. Bunning · 985 cases in index
- Docket number
- 7:02-cv-00234
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/17/2002
- Date terminated
- 03/04/2003
103 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hinkle v. Ssa?
Hinkle v. Ssa is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/17/2002 in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 03/04/2003. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky, docket number 7:02-cv-00234.
When was the case filed?
Hinkle v. Ssa was filed on 06/17/2002. It was terminated on 03/04/2003.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17872446 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 7:02-cv-00234 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).