Hoffman v. Fagg
Hoffman v. Fagg is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/11/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/18/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James E. Gritzner · 1,199 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:03-cv-40713
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/11/2003
- Date terminated
- 03/18/2004
1,007 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hoffman v. Fagg?
Hoffman v. Fagg is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/11/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/18/2004. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Iowa, docket number 4:03-cv-40713.
When was the case filed?
Hoffman v. Fagg was filed on 12/11/2003. It was terminated on 03/18/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11822659 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:03-cv-40713 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).