Hogan v. Bell
Hogan v. Bell is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 01/18/2002 in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia. The case was terminated on 09/16/2002.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. West Virginia (N.D.W. Va.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Irene M. Keeley · 1,932 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:02-cv-00009
- Nature of suit
- 110 Insurance
Disputes over an insurance policy — denial of a claim, the scope of coverage, or an insurer's alleged bad-faith handling. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 01/18/2002
- Date terminated
- 09/16/2002
2,672 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hogan v. Bell?
Hogan v. Bell is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 01/18/2002 in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia. The case was terminated on 09/16/2002. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia, docket number 1:02-cv-00009.
When was the case filed?
Hogan v. Bell was filed on 01/18/2002. It was terminated on 09/16/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 13961786).