Homan v. Clinton
Homan v. Clinton is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/05/1998 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/23/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David A. Katz · 2,693 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:98-cv-07254
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 05/05/1998
- Date terminated
- 06/23/1998
1,743 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Homan v. Clinton?
Homan v. Clinton is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/05/1998 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/23/1998. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 3:98-cv-07254.
When was the case filed?
Homan v. Clinton was filed on 05/05/1998. It was terminated on 06/23/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10601863 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:98-cv-07254 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).