Hulan v. Ewell
Hulan v. Ewell is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/22/1997 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 01/30/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Tennessee (E.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James H Jarvis · 1,911 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:97-cv-00081
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 09/22/1997
- Date terminated
- 01/30/1998
1,978 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hulan v. Ewell?
Hulan v. Ewell is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/22/1997 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 01/30/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee, docket number 4:97-cv-00081.
When was the case filed?
Hulan v. Ewell was filed on 09/22/1997. It was terminated on 01/30/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10394381 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:97-cv-00081 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).