Hunt v. Css
Hunt v. Css is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/28/1996 in the District Court, W.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 02/27/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Michigan (W.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Richard Alan Enslen · 2,025 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:96-cv-00178
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/28/1996
- Date terminated
- 02/27/1998
1,881 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hunt v. Css?
Hunt v. Css is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/28/1996 in the District Court, W.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 02/27/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Michigan, docket number 4:96-cv-00178.
When was the case filed?
Hunt v. Css was filed on 08/28/1996. It was terminated on 02/27/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10382287 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:96-cv-00178 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).