Hussey v. Agri
Hussey v. Agri is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/13/1996 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 05/25/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Idaho (D. Idaho)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- B. Lynn Winmill · 1,896 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:96-cv-00407
- Nature of suit
- 385 Property damage - Product liability
Property damage caused by an allegedly defective product. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 09/13/1996
- Date terminated
- 05/25/1999
313 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hussey v. Agri?
Hussey v. Agri is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/13/1996 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 05/25/1999. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Idaho, docket number 4:96-cv-00407.
When was the case filed?
Hussey v. Agri was filed on 09/13/1996. It was terminated on 05/25/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10861007 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:96-cv-00407 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).