In Re: Mata v. Mata
In Re: Mata v. Mata is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/22/1995 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 06/02/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 1:89-bj-00949
- Cause
- 28:1331 Fed. Question: Labor
28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 997 997
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 06/22/1995
- Date terminated
- 06/02/2004
2,445 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · In Re: Mata · 2 cases
- defendant · Mata · 235 cases
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is In Re: Mata v. Mata?
In Re: Mata v. Mata is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/22/1995 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 06/02/2004. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:89-bj-00949.
When was the case filed?
In Re: Mata v. Mata was filed on 06/22/1995. It was terminated on 06/02/2004.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 22947713 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:89-bj-00949 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).