In Re: v. Kinney
In Re: v. Kinney is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/15/1996 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 10/15/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Indiana (N.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Allen Sharp · 2,838 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:96-mc-00158
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/15/1996
- Date terminated
- 10/15/1996
336 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is In Re: v. Kinney?
In Re: v. Kinney is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/15/1996 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 10/15/1996. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Indiana, docket number 3:96-mc-00158.
When was the case filed?
In Re: v. Kinney was filed on 10/15/1996. It was terminated on 10/15/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17593774 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:96-mc-00158 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).