Ingram v. Conrad
Ingram v. Conrad is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/17/1999 in the District Court, M.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 04/09/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Georgia (M.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Hugh Lawson · 2,044 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:99-cv-00110
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/17/1999
- Date terminated
- 04/09/2002
922 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ingram v. Conrad?
Ingram v. Conrad is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/17/1999 in the District Court, M.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 04/09/2002. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Georgia, docket number 3:99-cv-00110.
When was the case filed?
Ingram v. Conrad was filed on 08/17/1999. It was terminated on 04/09/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13904284 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:99-cv-00110 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).