Insco v. Thompson
Insco v. Thompson is a federal civil rights lawsuit filed on 05/09/2006 in the District Court, District of Columbia. The case was terminated on 05/09/2006.
- Court
- District Court, District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Unassigned · 15,088 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:06-cv-00871
- Nature of suit
- 440 Civil rights other
Civil-rights claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/09/2006
- Date terminated
- 05/09/2006
17,017 Civil Rights cases in this court are indexed here.
About Civil Rights Lawsuits
Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Insco v. Thompson?
Insco v. Thompson is a federal civil rights lawsuit filed on 05/09/2006 in the District Court, District of Columbia. The case was terminated on 05/09/2006. Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Civil Rights” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, District of Columbia, docket number 1:06-cv-00871.
When was the case filed?
Insco v. Thompson was filed on 05/09/2006. It was terminated on 05/09/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Civil Rights Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 12068989).