Irs v. Easley
Irs v. Easley is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/17/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 12/18/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William M Acker, Jr · 2,959 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:92-cv-02553
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 12/17/1992
- Date terminated
- 12/18/1992
2,844 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Irs v. Easley?
Irs v. Easley is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/17/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 12/18/1992. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 5:92-cv-02553.
When was the case filed?
Irs v. Easley was filed on 12/17/1992. It was terminated on 12/18/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9682267 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:92-cv-02553 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).