Irs v. Hoch
Irs v. Hoch is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/29/1994 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 06/30/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Indiana (N.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William C Lee · 2,665 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:94-mc-00010
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/29/1994
- Date terminated
- 06/30/1994
336 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Irs v. Hoch?
Irs v. Hoch is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 06/29/1994 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 06/30/1994. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Indiana, docket number 1:94-mc-00010.
When was the case filed?
Irs v. Hoch was filed on 06/29/1994. It was terminated on 06/30/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13797438 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:94-mc-00010 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).