Jangbok Const Co v. Quitugua
Jangbok Const Co v. Quitugua is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/19/1989 in the District Court, D. Guam. The case was terminated on 10/11/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Guam (D. Guam)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 05/19/1989
- Date terminated
- 10/11/1990
32 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Jangbok Const Co
- defendant · Quitugua · 11 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jangbok Const Co v. Quitugua?
Jangbok Const Co v. Quitugua is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/19/1989 in the District Court, D. Guam. The case was terminated on 10/11/1990. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Guam.
When was the case filed?
Jangbok Const Co v. Quitugua was filed on 05/19/1989. It was terminated on 10/11/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9255584 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).