Johnson Etal v. U S
Johnson Etal v. U S is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 05/02/1988 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 10/27/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Kansas (D. Kan.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 620 Food and drug acts
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 05/02/1988
- Date terminated
- 10/27/1988
40 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Johnson Etal · 116 cases
- defendant · U S · 10161 cases
About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Johnson Etal v. U S?
Johnson Etal v. U S is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 05/02/1988 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 10/27/1988. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Kansas.
When was the case filed?
Johnson Etal v. U S was filed on 05/02/1988. It was terminated on 10/27/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8906589 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).