Johnson v. Addock
Johnson v. Addock is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/05/1991 in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 07/24/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Arkansas (W.D. Ark.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Morris S. Arnold · 185 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:91-cv-02123
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 06/05/1991
- Date terminated
- 07/24/1991
356 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Johnson v. Addock?
Johnson v. Addock is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/05/1991 in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 07/24/1991. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas, docket number 2:91-cv-02123.
When was the case filed?
Johnson v. Addock was filed on 06/05/1991. It was terminated on 07/24/1991.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9439464 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:91-cv-02123 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).