Johnson v. Cagle
Johnson v. Cagle is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/19/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 09/24/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sam R Cummings · 4,620 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:92-cv-00247
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 10/19/1992
- Date terminated
- 09/24/1993
2,448 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Johnson v. Cagle?
Johnson v. Cagle is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/19/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 09/24/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 5:92-cv-00247.
When was the case filed?
Johnson v. Cagle was filed on 10/19/1992. It was terminated on 09/24/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9377522 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:92-cv-00247 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).