Juricisin v. Gatch
Juricisin v. Gatch is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/17/1999 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/28/2001.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Herman J. Weber · 2,640 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:99-cv-01038
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/17/1999
- Date terminated
- 02/28/2001
764 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Juricisin v. Gatch?
Juricisin v. Gatch is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/17/1999 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/28/2001. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 1:99-cv-01038.
When was the case filed?
Juricisin v. Gatch was filed on 12/17/1999. It was terminated on 02/28/2001.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13929238 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:99-cv-01038 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).