Kagan v. Anastasio
Kagan v. Anastasio is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 11/23/1992 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 01/14/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Joseph L. Tauro · 3,743 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:92-cv-12810
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/23/1992
- Date terminated
- 01/14/1993
2,075 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kagan v. Anastasio?
Kagan v. Anastasio is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 11/23/1992 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 01/14/1993. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:92-cv-12810.
When was the case filed?
Kagan v. Anastasio was filed on 11/23/1992. It was terminated on 01/14/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9655329 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:92-cv-12810 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).