Kang v. Madigan
Kang v. Madigan is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/15/1992 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 01/28/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Raymond J. Dearie · 4,286 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:92-cv-04424
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 09/15/1992
- Date terminated
- 01/28/1993
14,782 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kang v. Madigan?
Kang v. Madigan is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/15/1992 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 01/28/1993. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 1:92-cv-04424.
When was the case filed?
Kang v. Madigan was filed on 09/15/1992. It was terminated on 01/28/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9656079 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:92-cv-04424 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).