Katzer v. Tanner
Katzer v. Tanner is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/17/2002 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 12/20/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Janice M. Stewart · 1,776 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:02-cv-01293
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/17/2002
- Date terminated
- 12/20/2002
625 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Katzer v. Tanner?
Katzer v. Tanner is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/17/2002 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 12/20/2002. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:02-cv-01293.
When was the case filed?
Katzer v. Tanner was filed on 09/17/2002. It was terminated on 12/20/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11675439 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:02-cv-01293 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).