Keane v. Cannondale
Keane v. Cannondale is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/12/1998 in the District Court, D. Maryland. The case was terminated on 04/09/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Maryland (D. Maryland)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Peter J. Messitte · 3,716 cases in index
- Docket number
- 8:98-cv-00088
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/12/1998
- Date terminated
- 04/09/1998
1,679 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Keane · 145 cases
- defendant · Cannondale
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Keane v. Cannondale?
Keane v. Cannondale is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/12/1998 in the District Court, D. Maryland. The case was terminated on 04/09/1998. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Maryland, docket number 8:98-cv-00088.
When was the case filed?
Keane v. Cannondale was filed on 01/12/1998. It was terminated on 04/09/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 33216983 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:98-cv-00088 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).