Keller v. Moss Etal
Keller v. Moss Etal is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 07/17/1984 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 10/11/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/17/1984
- Date terminated
- 10/11/1989
61 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.
About Antitrust Lawsuits
Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Keller v. Moss Etal?
Keller v. Moss Etal is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 07/17/1984 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 10/11/1989. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Iowa.
When was the case filed?
Keller v. Moss Etal was filed on 07/17/1984. It was terminated on 10/11/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Antitrust Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9047930 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).