King v. Good
King v. Good is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/21/2004 in the District Court, W.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 08/02/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Washington (W.D. Wash.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Thomas S. Zilly · 4,969 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:04-cv-01268
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/21/2004
- Date terminated
- 08/02/2004
1,168 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is King v. Good?
King v. Good is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/21/2004 in the District Court, W.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 08/02/2004. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Washington, docket number 2:04-cv-01268.
When was the case filed?
King v. Good was filed on 05/21/2004. It was terminated on 08/02/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11862700 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:04-cv-01268 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).