King v. Prudential Ins Amer
King v. Prudential Ins Amer is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 01/12/2004 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 02/08/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Phillip S. Figa · 305 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:04-cv-00059
- Cause
- 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
29 U.S.C. § 1132 — ERISA (employee benefits) - Nature of suit
- 110 Insurance
Disputes over an insurance policy — denial of a claim, the scope of coverage, or an insurer's alleged bad-faith handling. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 01/12/2004
- Date terminated
- 02/08/2005
14,046 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · King · 8426 cases
- defendant · Prudential Ins Amer · 67 cases
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is King v. Prudential Ins Amer?
King v. Prudential Ins Amer is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 01/12/2004 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 02/08/2005. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:04-cv-00059.
When was the case filed?
King v. Prudential Ins Amer was filed on 01/12/2004. It was terminated on 02/08/2005.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 29 U.S.C. § 1132 — ERISA (employee benefits).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 21936955 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:04-cv-00059 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).